Papon in Perspective
Richard Vinen questions whether the recently convicted Maurice Papon was charged with the correct crime.
The trial of Maurice Papon for crimes against humanity, which finished on April 1st this year, was messy. In part this springs from the fact that the crimes under examination, i.e. the participation of French civil servants in the deportation of Jews from the area around Bordeaux between 1942 and 1944, took place such a long time ago. Testimonies were full of rambling irrelevance. Witnesses were old. Papon himself is eighty-seven. In intellectual terms he is sharp, but physically he is frail. The trial had to be interrupted while he was in hospital and was suspended for several days because his wife died as his main defence counsel began a final address to the court.
To continue reading this article you need to purchase a subscription, available from only £5.
Start my trial subscription now
If you have already purchased access, or are a print & archive subscriber, please ensure you are logged in.
Please email digital@historytoday.com if you have any problems.
