Putting Mothers on Death Row

US law requires a stay of execution for pregnant women on death row. In practice, however, this once only applied to mothers considered ‘good enough’.

Beatrice Snipes with her baby, 1933. Courtesy of Richland Library, Columbia, South Carolina.

In 1778 the commonwealth of Massachusetts executed a pregnant woman. Bathsheba Spooner had insisted all the way to the execution grounds that she was with child, but a jury of matrons, a group of married women empowered by the court to examine potentially pregnant women, disagreed. English Common Law (which governed the colonies at the time) required a stay of execution when a condemned woman was found to be ‘quick with child’, or physically felt by the mother. Despite the intervention of the Reverend Thaddeus Maccarty and the dissenting opinion of a physician, Spooner was hanged. Her last request was for an autopsy. Maccarty wrote: ‘She was opened … and a perfect male foetus of the growth of five months … was taken from her.’ Massachusetts had executed a foetus. Yet, probably because of the ongoing Revolutionary War, there was no public outcry.

To continue reading this article you need to purchase a subscription, available from only £5.

Start my trial subscription now

If you have already purchased access, or are a print & archive subscriber, please ensure you are logged in.

Please email digital@historytoday.com if you have any problems.