Leaving Independent Burma Behind

Burma – now Myanmar – became independent in 1948. Could Britain have done more for this unhappy country?

Members of the Burmese delegation in front of Buckingham Palace, after the audience with King George V, December 1930. Narodowe Archiwum Cyfrowe. Public Domain.

Burma (Myanmar) is a country on its knees. Its people, among the poorest in the world, live out an Orwellian nightmare. Child soldiers march as slave workers dig. The SPDC regime is politically isolated and obsessively insular, its paranoid and corrupt military leadership dependent on clique for office, intent on maintaining internal control of a country torn apart by ethnic conflict. Only Chinese patronage allows the junta to stagger brutally on.

On the face of it, in 1945 Burma was wealthy and eager to strike out for independence. While postwar India has survived assassination, dynasty and ethnic slaughter, Burma’s history has been a catastrophe. Why was Burma different? What did the British leave behind when Sir Hubert Rance, the last Governor, sailed out of Rangoon on January 4th, 1948?

To continue reading this article you need to purchase a subscription, available from only £5.

Start my trial subscription now

If you have already purchased access, or are a print & archive subscriber, please ensure you are logged in.

Please email digital@historytoday.com if you have any problems.