The Opponents of King John
For the cogent reasons explained here by Anthony Beadles, the revolt against King John was led largely by the Northern barons.
For the cogent reasons explained here by Anthony Beadles, the revolt against King John was led largely by the Northern barons.
William Seymour describes how a large area of Dorset and Wiltshire, abounding in deer, was hunted by King John and granted to Robert Cecil by James I.
W.L. Warren makes an attempt to sift the facts from the lurid legend of an English monarch who has left a reputation for evil second only to Richard III’s.
Deryck Abel reflects on a crucial figure in the dispute between King John of England and Pope Innocent III, which in turn led to the issuing of Magna Carta in 1215.
Sean McGlynn reconsiders the origins of the popular myth and suggests a new contender for the original folk hero; not an outlaw from Nottingham but a devoted royal servant from Kent, who opposed the French invasion against King John in 1216.
This essay was the winner of the 2012 Julia Wood essay prize.
Arthur Bryant examines the background to Magna Carta.
For centuries King John has been regarded as the embodiment of an evil ruler. But, says Graham E. Seel, this image is largely the creation of monastic chroniclers with an axe to grind. A close examination of contemporary records reveals a more nuanced character.
Nick Barratt argues that Normandy’s loss in the reign of King John has had a far-reaching impact on Britain.
Ralph V. Turner considers how and why Magna Carta became a beacon of liberty in Britain and, increasingly, in the United States.