History With the Boring Bits Put Back

Terry Jones, former Python, describes how a perverse fascination with the boring bits of Chaucer converted him from being a clown into a historian of the 14th century.

Archbishop Arundel read a Papal Bull, 1399.

Every child is naturally interested in history. You want to know what went on before you; it’s the way you know who you are and where you stand on the planet. Unfortunately, though, it can so easily get wiped out of you. As a child I used to have little picture books on Tudors or Stuarts and suchlike, and I was fascinated by the pictures and wanted to find out more. But my fascination was killed at secondary school by having to do British nineteenth-century political history for O-Level, the Reform Act and the end of the Corn Laws and everything. When we’d taken the exams I couldn’t wait to go on to something else, but when I went to my first history lesson in the sixth form they said: ‘It’s a shame not to build on what we've done’, so we did it all over again for another two years – so that was all the history I ever learned at school.

To continue reading this article you need to purchase a subscription, available from only £5.

Start my trial subscription now

If you have already purchased access, or are a print & archive subscriber, please ensure you are logged in.

Please email digital@historytoday.com if you have any problems.