The Scots in England 1640-1651
Graham Seel uncovers their pivotal and sometimes underhand role in the struggle between king and parliament.
The royalist historian Clarendon was at loss to explain the motivations of the Scots between the years 1640 and 1651. He describes their actions as exhibiting 'such a degree of sottishness and a depraved understanding that they can never be looked upon as men who knew what their interest was, or what (was) necessary to advance their own designs'. It is a sentiment with which it is easy to agree. These eleven years witnessed four periods of military intervention in England by the Scots: 1640-41, 1644-47, 1648 and 1651. On the first two of these occasions the Scots fought with the English parliament against the king; in 1648 and 1651 this allegiance was exactly reversed. From the English perspective, all of this appears to be inconsistent, treacherous and 'depraved'. When viewed from the Scottish position, however, it is possible to recognise an underlying consistency of aim.
To continue reading this article you need to purchase a subscription, available from only £5.
Start my trial subscription now
If you have already purchased access, or are a print & archive subscriber, please ensure you are logged in.
Please email digital@historytoday.com if you have any problems.
