Forum: Entertaining Historians?
Douglas Johnson considers whether anecdotes are a mark of the self-indulgent historian.
Most historians have to deal with the problem of the anecdote. Some historians who work on subjects where the supply of relevant anecdotes is sparse, tend to envy their colleagues who are able to entertain their readers (and catch the attention of reviewers) with enlivening stories. But everyone, in reality, fears the dread word 'anecdotage', and it is well known that there are only too many examples of historians who have failed to resist the temptations of facility and who have written that which is amusing rather than that which aids understanding.
To continue reading this article you need to purchase a subscription, available from only £5.
Start my trial subscription now
If you have already purchased access, or are a print & archive subscriber, please ensure you are logged in.
Please email digital@historytoday.com if you have any problems.
