Demythologising Nye Bevan
In a controversial new study of Labour’s great post-war hero, John Campbell argues that Bevan was both more of a Marxist and a hard-nosed politician than his friends and admirers have portrayed.
It is more than a quarter of a century since Aneurin Bevan died. In his lifetime, right up to the onset of his final illness in 1959, he was the most charismatic and controversial, the most loved and the most loathed political personality in Britain. By the time of his death in July 1960 he was widely recognised, by opponents as well as by his long-time supporters, as one of the most gifted and creative political leaders to have graced British politics this century – the equal in potential, if not in achievement, of David Lloyd George and Winston Churchill.
Since 1960 he has been all but canonised, raised above criticism as the soul and conscience of the old Labour Party, the father of the National Health Service and a source of emotional inspiration and legitimising quotations, while successive Labour leaders from Wilson to Kinnock have fallen over themselves to assert their claim to his mantle.
To continue reading this article you need to purchase a subscription, available from only £5.
Start my trial subscription now
If you have already purchased access, or are a print & archive subscriber, please ensure you are logged in.
Please email digital@historytoday.com if you have any problems.
