What Makes a Good Historian?
Richard Wilkinson shows that good history is never dull.
‘Your problem, Hugh, is that you ignore the documents.’
‘Your problem, Taylor, is that you ignore the facts.’
As Oxford’s two finest historians locked horns in the full glare of the TV spotlights, their compère Robert Kee nervously tried to prevent a physical punch-up. While, however, Taylor and Trevor-Roper disagreed about the merits of the recently published The Origins of the Second World War (‘Why has Mr. Taylor written such a bad book?’, Trevor-Roper had wondered in his Encounter review), they implicitly agreed that the truth matters above all, that indeed truth is the only real priority for the good historian.
To continue reading this article you need to purchase a subscription, available from only £5.
Start my trial subscription now
If you have already purchased access, or are a print & archive subscriber, please ensure you are logged in.
Please email digital@historytoday.com if you have any problems.
